This position statement sets out ICMM members’ approach to the governance of tailings storage facilities (TSFs) for the mining and metals industry to minimise the risk of catastrophic failure of tailings facilities.
Tailings are the solid material plus varying degrees of runoff and process water (waste) remaining after the recoverable metals and minerals have been extracted from mined ore. The physical and chemical characteristics of the tailings vary with the nature of the ore, its geological setting and the climate where the tailings are placed. Tailings are most commonly stored in surface facilities, which can represent a significant area of disturbance at mining operations.
The foundation for this position statement is a tailings storage facility (TSF) governance framework which enhances focus on those key elements of management and governance necessary to maintain integrity of TSFs and minimise the risk of catastrophic failures. The six key elements of this TSF governance framework are:
- Accountability, Responsibility and Competency.
- Planning and Resourcing.
- Risk Management.
- Change Management.
- Emergency Preparedness and Response.
- Review and Assurance.
Relationship between the ICMM Mining Principles and Position Statements
All ICMM company members are expected to implement ICMM's Mining Principles as a condition of membership. Incorporating comprehensive environmental, social and governance requirements, robust site-level validation of performance expectations and credible assurance of corporate sustainability reports, ICMM’s Mining Principles seek to maximise benefits to host communities and minimise negative impacts to effectively manage societal challenges.
Principles of particular relevance to preventing catastrophic failure of TSFs are:
PRINCIPLE 1: ETHICAL BUSINESS
Apply ethical business practices and sound systems of corporate governance and transparency to support sustainable development.
PRINCIPLE 2: DECISION-MAKING
Integrate sustainable development in corporate strategy and decision-making processes.
PRINCIPLE 4: RISK MANAGEMENT
Implement effective risk-management strategies and systems based on sound science and which account for stakeholder perceptions of risks.
PRINCIPLE 5: HEALTH AND SAFETY
Pursue continual improvement in health and safety performance with the ultimate goal of zero harm.
PRINCIPLE 6: ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE
Pursue continual improvement in environmental performance issues, such as water stewardship, energy use and climate change.
PRINCIPLE 7: CONSERVATION OF BIODIVERSITY
Contribute to the conservation of biodiversity and integrated approaches to land-use planning.
PRINCIPLE 10: STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT
Proactively engage key stakeholders on sustainable development challenges and opportunities in an open and transparent manner. Effectively report and independently verify progress and performance.
Since 2003, Position Statements have been developed to clearly articulate member commitments on a number of critical industry challenges. Position Statements are endorsed by the ICMM Council and include specific commitments that members must implement, alongside the Performance Expectations.
ICMM members recognise that:
- Tailings production is inherent to mining and minerals processing and will remain so for the foreseeable future. These materials require engineered solutions for their long-term safe storage and sustainable management.
- TSFs undergo ongoing changes over their life cycle which must be considered and managed to ensure continued TSF safety and structural integrity.
- Catastrophic TSF failures are unacceptable and owners and operators of such facilities should ensure systems, standards and resources are in place to prevent failures.
- Potential for TSF failures must be considered and addressed through a facility’s life cycle, which includes design, construction, operation and closure.
- Technical guidance exists to support preventing catastrophic failures of TSFs through appropriate design, construction, operation and closure. Owners and operators utilise this along with the judgement of competent designers and experts. Some extreme natural events are impossible to predict.
- Each TSF is unique. Site conditions, mineral characteristics and other aspects of each mine site dictate appropriate tailings technology and storage solutions. Although no single design or operating practice can be adopted universally, the industry continually seeks to improve and develop techniques and new technologies and implement them as appropriate.
In addition to existing commitments under ICMM's Mining Principles, ICMM company members commit to implement practices consistent with the Tailings Governance Framework (the ‘Framework’) so that the risk of catastrophic failure of tailings storage facilities is minimised.
Tailings Governance Framework
The purpose of the Tailings Governance Framework is to enable enhanced focus on the following six key elements of management and governance necessary to prevent catastrophic failures of tailings storage facilities (TSFs).
1. Accountability, Responsibility and Competency
Accountabilities, responsibilities and associated competencies are defined to support appropriate identification and management of TSF risks.
1.1. Accountability for the overall governance of tailings facilities resides with the owners and operators.
1.2. Organisational structures and roles are established to support management of TSF risks and governance accountability.
1.3. Communication processes are maintained to ensure that personnel understand their responsibilities. Training is conducted to maintain currency of knowledge and skills.
1.4. Role competency and experience requirements are defined for critical roles within the established organisational structures.
2. Planning and Resourcing
The financial and human resources needed to support continued TSF management and governance are maintained throughout a facility’s life cycle.
2.1. TSF operating and capital costs, and human resource needs, are included in relevant business planning processes.
2.2. Resources necessary to implement and maintain activities within this governance framework are provided.
3. Risk Management
Risk management associated with TSFs includes risk identification, an appropriate control regime and the verification of control performance.
3.1. Risk controls and their associated verification activities are identified based on failure modes and their associated consequences, and evaluated on a TSF-specific basis considering all phases of the TSF life cycle.
3.2. Suitably qualified and experienced experts are involved in TSF risk identification and analysis, as well as in the development and review of effectiveness of the associated controls.
3.3. Performance criteria are established for risk controls and their associated monitoring, internal reporting and verification activities.
4. Change Management
Risks associated with potential changes are assessed, controlled and communicated to avoid inadvertently compromising TSF integrity.
4.1. Processes are applied that involve the identification, assessment, control and communication of risks to TSF integrity arising from both internally-driven and externally-driven change, to avoid introducing uncertain, unacceptable, and/or unmanaged risks.
4.2. Documents and records that support TSF planning, design, construction, operation, surveillance, management and governance are maintained and kept suitably current and accessible.
5. Emergency Preparedness and Response
Processes are in place to recognise and respond to impending failure of TSFs and mitigate the potential impacts arising from a potentially catastrophic failure.
5.1. Action thresholds and their corresponding response to early warning signs of potential catastrophic failure are established.
5.2. Emergency preparedness and response plans are established commensurate with potential failure consequences. Such plans specify roles, responsibilities and communication procedures.
5.3. Emergency preparedness and response plans are periodically tested.
6. Review and Assurance
Internal and external review and assurance processes are in place so that controls for TSF risks can be comprehensively assessed and continually improved.
6.1. Internal performance monitoring and inspections and internal and external reviews and assurance are conducted commensurate with consequences of TSF failure to evaluate and to continually improve the effectiveness of risk controls.
6.2. Outcomes and actions arising from TSF review and assurance processes are recorded, reviewed, closed-out and communicated.
6.3. Performance of risk management programmes for TSFs is reported to executive management on a regular basis.
1. Members are expected to implement the commitments in this Position Statement by November 2018. The Position Statement will not apply retroactively.